Category: Mailing or Enclosure

Mailing or Enclosure

Parliamentary question and answer of 29 March 2001 re. ASYLUM SEEKERS

Parliamentary question and answer of 29 March 2001 re. ASYLUM SEEKERS

Mailing or Enclosure

IND to ILPA of 7 April 2001 re. IMMIGRATION APPLICATION FORMS

IND to ILPA of 7 April 2001 re. IMMIGRATION APPLICATION FORMS

Mailing or Enclosure

Bail for Immigration Detainees to ILPA of 3 April 2001 re. DOCUMENTS WHICH MIGHT BE OF ASSISTANCE TO PRACTITIONERS WHO ARE MAKING BAIL APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE IAA

Bail for Immigration Detainees to ILPA of 3 April 2001 re. DOCUMENTS WHICH MIGHT BE OF ASSISTANCE TO PRACTITIONERS WHO ARE MAKING BAIL APPLICATIONS BEFORE THE IAA

Mailing or Enclosure

IND to ILPA of 3 April 2001 re. FAMILY VISITOR APPEALS REVIEW

IND to ILPA of 3 April 2001 re. FAMILY VISITOR APPEALS REVIEW

Mailing or Enclosure

Home Office to ILPA of 18 April 2001 re. FORCED MARRIAGES

Home Office to ILPA of 18 April 2001 re. FORCED MARRIAGES

Mailing or Enclosure

Bindman & Partners to ILPA of 5 April 2001 enclosing IND to The Law Society of 4 February 2000 and IND to Bindman & Partners of 31 March 2001 re. SIERRA LEONE POLICY

Bindman & Partners to ILPA of 5 April 2001 enclosing IND to The Law Society of 4 February 2000 and IND to Bindman & Partners of 31 March 2001 re. […]

Mailing or Enclosure

Home Office Immigration and Nationality Directorate (IND) to Asylum Processes Stakeholder Group of 11 April 2001 re. Asylum: operational guidance notes

Home Office Immigration and Nationality Directorate (IND)  to Asylum Processes Stakeholder Group of 11 April 2001 re. Asylum: operational guidance notes  Includes: Operational guidance note Iraq version 1 April 2001

Mailing or Enclosure

Darbys Mallam Lewis Solicitors to ILPA of 17 April 2001 re. DETERMINATION AND REASONS ON ASYLUM SEEKER FROM KOSOVO

Darbys Mallam Lewis Solicitors to ILPA of 17 April 2001 re. DETERMINATION AND REASONS ON ASYLUM SEEKER FROM KOSOVO

Mailing or Enclosure

JUDGMENT IN THE CASE OF HILAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM

JUDGMENT IN THE CASE OF HILAL v. THE UNITED KINGDOM