Other organisations’ responses to Transforming Legal Aid, June 2013
- Document Date
- 2013-06-05
- Issue Number
- 13.06.18078
Attachments:
- Bingham Centre for the Rule of Law
- Bar Council
- Bar Standards Board
- The Law Society
- Public Law Project
- Young Legal Aid Lawyers
- Medical Justice response
- ECPAT UK Response
- Refugee Children's Consortium Response
- Asylum Support Appeals Project response
- Local Government Association, Association of Directors of Children's Services and No Recourse to Public Funds Network statement
- No Recourse to Public Funds Network response
- Response of Jim Blair - Residence Test and Domestic Violence from a police perspective
- Asylum Aid response
- Matrix Chambers
- Leigh Day and Co response
- Response of Richard Moorhead, Lawyerwatch
- Response of Justice
- Public Interest Lawyers' response
- Association of Prison Lawyers' Response
- British Institute of Human Rights
- Doughty Street Chambers
- Legal Aid Practitioners' Group response
- Garden Court Chambers
- Response of Robert Stephen Symonds
- Letter of Treasury Counsel
- Michael Fordham QC Ben Jaffey Ravi Metha Opinion as to legality of residence test
- Response of the Office of the Children's Commissioner
- Response of the Howard League for Penal Reform
- Response of Freedom from Torture
- Response from Refugee Action
- The Church of England
- Response of Sir Henry Brooke
- The Parole Board
- Parliamentary and Health Services Ombuds
- The Official Solicitor
- Magistrates' Association
- Legal Services Consumer Panel
- Her Majesty's chief Inspector of Prisons
- Family Law Bar Association
- Constitutional and Administrative Law Bar Association and Bar European Group
- Civil Justice Council
- QCs' 29 May letter to the Telegraph
- Response from the Equality and Human Rights Commission